L'intelligence artificielle générative et ses usages informels dans les projets de recherche : revue systématique des impacts sur la performance et la gouvernance

Abdellah BOUKIND; Habiba ABOU-HAFS

doi:10.23882/ijdam.26296

Autores

Abdellah BOUKIND FSJES Ait Melloul , Université Ibn Zohr , Agadir, Maroc.
Habiba ABOU-HAFS FSJES Ait Melloul , Université Ibn Zohr , Agadir, Maroc.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23882/ijdam.26296

Palavras-chave:

Intelligence artificielle générative, Usages informels, Recherche scientifique, Performance , Gouvernance

Resumo

L'intelligence artificielle générative s'impose progressivement comme un levier transformationnel au sein des écosystèmes de recherche scientifique, déployant des capacités inédites pour l'automatisation, l'extraction et la création de contenus scientifiques. Cette pénétration s'accompagne cependant d'une prolifération d'usages informels qui échappent aux cadres institutionnels établis, manifestés par le recours autonome à des modèles de langage, assistants virtuels et outils de génération de protocoles. Notre revue systématique examine la reconfiguration des paradigmes de performance induite par ces pratiques émergentes, en considérant simultanément les dimensions qualitatives (innovation, créativité scientifique) et quantitatives (efficacité, précision métrologique). L'étude interroge parallèlement la transformation des modes de gouvernance, à travers l'émergence de normes professionnelles non formalisées, les reconfigurations des enjeux d'intégrité scientifique et les tensions autour des régimes de propriété intellectuelle. L'analyse met en évidence la nécessité d'anticiper les mutations structurelles affectant trois domaines critiques : la sécurisation des données de recherche, l'adaptation aux cadres réglementaires et l'évolution des modèles de gouvernance institutionnelle. Nous proposons des pistes concrètes pour l'actualisation des cadres déontologiques et des référentiels de compétences. Plus fondamentalement, cette recherche suggère la nécessité d'une reconfiguration des dynamiques collaboratives, visant à institutionnaliser le potentiel innovant des usages détournés tout en maîtrisant leurs risques associés. La réflexion débouche sur la perspective d'un nouveau paradigme organisationnel où la complexité croissante et le potentiel transformateur des usages informels pourraient constituer les fondations d'un écosystème de recherche à la fois plus agile et robuste.

Referências

Abd-karim, S. B., & Mohd-danuri, M. S. (2020). Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation : A systematic literature review International Journal of Project Management Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation : A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.007

Akregbou.BPS. (2025). Intégration de l’Intelligence Artificielle Générative cote d’ivoir.pdf. Revue Belge Des Sciences de l’Éducation, 11(130), 91–112. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17290967

Albadawy.M, & Al. (2024). Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research : An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5(March), 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

Andersen.J.P, & Al. (2025). Technology in Society Generative Artificial Intelligence ( GenAI ) in the research process – A survey of researchers ’ practices and perceptions. 81(September 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102813

Babbie.E.R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage Au.

Barnes, R. (2022). Healthcare diagnosis and treatment in the metaverse: remote sensing algorithms, networked wearable devices, and virtual patient data. American Journal of Medical Research, 9(2), 41–56.

Bender.Emily, & Al. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? FAccT 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Benko.A., & Lányi.C.S. (2009). History of $ UWLۋFLDO , QWHOOLJHQFH. IGI Global, 1759–1762.

Blei.D.M, & Al. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. 3, 993–1022.

Bollen.J, & Al. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. 224-226.

Boukind.A, & Abou-Hafs.H. (2024). Contribution de l’Intelligence Artificielle à la Performance des Projets de Recherche Scientifique. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 20(34), 190. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n34p190

Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2014). Research Collaboration and Team Science. Https://Books.Google.Com/Books?Hl=en&lr=&id=31clBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP5&ots=iaafo5uLWU&sig=gBpQb7Ybju5UfSw0mrgYy-YLJvA#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Brown.T.B, & Al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. NeurIPS.

Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A., & Machine, P. (2017). Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. In New York: W.W. Norton & Company. WW Norton & Company.

Clark.J, & Al. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence use in evidence synthesis : A systematic review. 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2025.16

Cornell University Task Force. (2023). Generative AI in Academic Research : Perspectives and Cultural Norms.

Dhariwal.P, & Al. (2021). Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis. 34(NeurIPS 2021), 8780–8794.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Louise, E., Jeyaraj, A., Kumar, A., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Ahmad, M., Al-busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). International Journal of Information Management Opinion Paper : “ So what if ChatGPT wrote it ? ” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities , challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research , practice and policy ☆. 71(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Goodchild.L, & Al. (2024). Attitudes toward AI Insights 2024. Elsevier, 11–12.

Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., & Warde-farley, D. (2014). Generative Adversarial Nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 27, 1–9.

Gozalo-brizuela.R, & Eduardo.C. (2023). A survey of Generative AI Applications. ArXiv.

Hagendorff.T. (2024). Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review. Minds and Machines, 34(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09694-w

Hessels.L.K. (2013). Coordination in the Science System : Theoretical Framework and a Case Study of an Intermediary Organization. 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9230-1

Ho.J, & Al. (2020). Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. 256(NeurIPS 2020), 1–12.

Holmes.W, & Miao.F. (2024). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.

Jochen.K, & Al. (2024). Sentiment Analysis in the Age of Generative AI. Customer Needs and Solutions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-024-00143-4

Kitchenham.B, & Al. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Krauss.A. (2024). Redefining the scientific method : As the use of sophisticated scientific methods that extend our mind. PNAS Nexus, 3(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae112

Kuhn.T.S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

Kunisch, S., Denyer, D., Bartunek, J. M., Menz, M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2023). Review Research as Scienti fi c Inquiry. 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221127292

Lim.W.M. (2023). The International Journal of Management Education ¨ k or Generative AI and the future of education : Ragnar o reformation ? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(March), 1–13.

Lund.B.D, & Al. (2023). ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: AI-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 4(5), 570-581.

Madera.M, & Al. (2025). A comprehensive guide to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. 33(October 2024).

Manning.S, & Al. (2023). GPTs are GPTs : An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models. 1–35.

McCorduck.P, & Al. (1977). HISTORY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. In IJCAI, 951–954.

Merton.R.K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago press.

Mollick.E, & Al. (n.d.). Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier : Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier : Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worke.

Morrison, M., Mourby, M., Gowans, H., Coy, S., & Kaye, J. (2020). Governance of research consortia : challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe. 1–19.

Nathalie, A. H.-, & Hassouni, A. (2025). IA GÉNÉRATIVE ET RECHERCHE : NOUVEAUX QUESTIONNEMENTS ÉTHIQUES ? 1–10.

Notaro.A. (2022). All that is solid melts in the Ethereum : the brave new ( art ) world of NFTs All that is solid melts in the Ethereum : the brave new ( art ) world of NFTs. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 2029. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2022.2129204

Page.M.J, & Al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Perkins.M, & Roe.J. (2024). Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies. 1–14. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06872

Pikoos.J, & Al. (2025). Cadre de Gouvernance de l ’ IA Générative.

Popper.K. (2012). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 1–4.

Ratnam.K. (2025). Generative arti fi cial intelligence in public health research and scienti fi c communication : A narrative review of real applications and future directions. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251362070

Salman.H.A, & Al. (2025). Systematic analysis of generative AI tools integration in academic research and peer review. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(June 2020), 1–20.

Schmidhuber.J, & Al. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Truhn.D, & Al. (2024). Reporting guidelines in medical arti fi cial intelligence : a systematic review and. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00492-0

UNESCO. (2021). Impacts De L ’ Intelligence Artificielle. Iqvia.

VanDis, E. A., & Al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in science today. In Artificial Intelligence in Science. https://doi.org/10.1787/584b1156-en

Viseur.R. (2025). Repenser la recherche d ’ information à l ’ ère des ia génératives : quels enjeux pour les sciences de gestion ? Management et Datascience, 1–8.