Le rôle du financement de l’innovation dans l’amélioration de la performance environnementale et sociale des entreprises industrielles : : analyse à partir de données de panel

Idriss IAATAREN; Zakaria BEN DARKAWI; Elmehdi SAHLI; Nadir EL BOUBKARI

doi:10.23882/ijdam.26285

Autores

Idriss IAATAREN Ecole ESTEM -Casablanca, Maroc https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0105-6682
Zakaria BEN DARKAWI Université Hassan II Casablanca, Maroc https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4114-9520
Elmehdi SAHLI Université Hassan II, Casablanca, Maroc.
Nadir EL BOUBKARI Université Mohamed I Oujda, Maroc https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7783-6199

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23882/ijdam.26285

Palavras-chave:

Financement de l’innovation , Performance environnementale , Performance Sociale des Entreprises, Entreprises industrielles , Développement durable

Resumo

Le financement de l’innovation et son impact sur la performance environnementale et sociale des entreprises industrielles suscitent un intérêt croissant dans le contexte actuel de transition vers une économie durable. S’inscrivant dans cette perspective, cette étude analyse la relation entre les différentes formes de financement de l’innovation (intensité de R&D et subventions publiques) et la performance durable des entreprises industrielles marocaines sur la période étudiée. Les données, collectées auprès de sources statistiques nationales et internationales, sont analysées à l’aide de modèles de panel à effets fixes, permettant de tester empiriquement trois hypothèses principales, incluant le rôle modérateur de la taille de l’entreprise. Les résultats indiquent que le financement de l’innovation exerce un effet positif et significatif sur la performance environnementale et sociale, et que cet impact est renforcé dans les grandes entreprises. En revanche, les effets sur la performance économique durable sont plus nuancés. L’étude conclut que le soutien au financement de l’innovation constitue un levier stratégique pour améliorer la durabilité des entreprises industrielles, et recommande de renforcer les politiques publiques ciblant l’innovation responsable pour atteindre les Objectifs de Développement Durable (ODD).

Referências

Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068

Alam, A., Uddin, M., & Yazdifar, H. (2019). Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 34–44.

Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Patacconi, A. (2018). The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 3–32.

Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International Business Review, 26(2), 324–336.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bossle, M. B., de Barcellos, M. D., Vieira, L. M., & Sauvée, L. (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation: Evidence from the organic food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.033

Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2012). Do financing constraints matter for R&D? European Economic Review, 56(8), 1512–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.007

Cainelli, G., De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2015). Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.008

Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470

Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2011). R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics, 36(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9189-3

Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2004). The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending and technological performance. ZEW Discussion Papers, 04–56. Centre for European Economic Research.

Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2019). Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2286

Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). MIT Press.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609–639). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

Horbach, J. (2016). Empirical determinants of eco‐innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005

Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco‐innovations by type of environmental impact: The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005

Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.12.002

Institut de statistique de l’UNESCO. (2021). Rapport mondial sur la science, la technologie et l’innovation 2021. UNESCO.

Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383

Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long‐run impact of the SBIR program. The Journal of Business, 72(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1086/209616

Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques. (2023). OCDE.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing.

Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3

Rennings, K., & Rammer, C. (2011). The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance. Industry and Innovation, 18(3), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.561027

Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill.

Westman, H. (2011). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the airline industry. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(6), 175–184.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.